Search for: "Herrick v. Herrick"
Results 21 - 40
of 120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am
Cites to Doe v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 1:18 pm
Knowles tells the human story behind this historic case.West Coast Hotel v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:10 am
The claim should also be reinstated against Herrick Feinstein (see Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 6-7 [1st Dept 2009] [finding that sound policy considerations support the tolling of the statute of limitations under the continuous representation doctrine while the representation of the same matter in which the malpractice is alleged is ongoing], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010]). [read post]
12 May 2021, 9:15 am
Furthermore, because Section 230 would apply to claims about outputted content, this opinion wouldn’t change cases like Herrick v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 3:14 am
“The motion court properly dismissed as time barred the legal malpractice claims that pertain to legal services received from Levine and Herrick Feinstein from 2002-2005. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 8:04 am
Zillow (false light); Herrick v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 8:54 am
The Safe Tech Act responds, among other things, to the Herrick v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 8:08 am
Smith v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 9:02 am
In Elliott v. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 4:59 pm
[iv] If there is no direct evidence of such an agreement, plaintiffs must show there was parallel action—where the defendants all acted in unison and the behavior “would probably not result from chance, coincidence, independent responses to common stimuli, or mere interdependence unaided by an advance understanding among the parties”[v]—and “plus factors” which show collusion. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 9:11 am
” Notice the parallels between this case and Herrick v. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 4:48 pm
On Wednesday, I’ll be on a panel regarding Herrick v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:26 am
Facebook (2d Circuit), Herrick v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 1:29 pm
Grindr, Klayman v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 2:00 pm
New York law requires disqualification for disclosure of information that “embrace[s] substantive issues related to the” action and that was “made in confidence” to facilitate the provision of legal services, as the Court of Appeals long held in Seeley v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 8:31 am
The Herrick v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:36 am
Goldman twitted about the denial of cert in Herrick v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:26 am
Herrick, P.A., 91 USPQ2d at 1509 (citing In re N. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 12:15 pm
(Dyroff v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 10:02 am
I think it also pairs nicely with the Second Circuit’s uncited Herrick v. [read post]
