Search for: "Herring v. Humphrey" Results 41 - 60 of 221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2012, 4:25 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Humphreys v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 14 – 15 March 2012. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Justin Humphrey, spoke of the pregnant woman as a “host” to the pregnancy who cannot simply kill her invited guest. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:50 am by Laura Sandwell
Humphreys v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 14 – 15 March 2012. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Case law has long held that an employee may not be found guilty of acts of alleged misconduct or incompetence that have not been charged [see, for example, Shuster v Humphrey, 156 NY 231].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2015/2015_06924.htm_________________The Discipline Book, - A 458 page guide to disciplinary actions involving public officers and employees. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:58 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Humphreys v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 14 – 15 March 2012. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 8:45 am by Public Employment Law Press
§5481(12).[6]Humphrey’s Executor v United States , 295 U.S. 602.This is an example of the material posted on NYPPL. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:57 am by Laura Sandwell
Humphreys v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 14 – 15 March 2012. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:34 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Humphreys v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 14 – 15 March 2012. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:26 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Humphreys v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 14 – 15 March 2012. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Humphreys v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 14 – 15 March 2012. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 12:15 pm
Second, assuming Congress stays out of it, limitations on removal are permissible if they do not prevent the president from performing his or her "constitutionally assigned duties. [read post]