Search for: "Herring v. Humphrey"
Results 121 - 140
of 223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
Humphrey, 14-8349 (second post-record relist), asks whether the “Georgia courts err[ed] in failing to recognize race discrimination under Batson in the extraordinary circumstances of this death penalty case. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
Humphrey, 14-8349, asks whether the “Georgia courts err[ed] in failing to recognize race discrimination under Batson in the extraordinary circumstances of this death penalty case. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:17 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 4:23 am
In Brenda Mockbee v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am
Bogan v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am
See paragraph 13(a) of my decision in RJ v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2012] AACR 28. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 11:14 am
Bond v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
If civil rights lawyers begin invoking the principles elaborated and consolidated by popular spokesmen like Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey and Richard Nixon and Everett Dirksen, and not only depend on the opinions of the Warren and Burger Courts, these justices may begin to embrace an originalist framework that provides this great legacy with a solid foundation in popular sovereignty.Supreme Court litigators have one overriding objective: getting five votes on their side. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
TCRR identifies the principal catalysts of the revolution as Lyndon Johnson, Hubert Humphrey, Richard Nixon, Everett McKinley Dirksen, and Dr. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
TCRR identifies the principal catalysts of the revolution as Lyndon Johnson, Hubert Humphrey, Richard Nixon, Everett McKinley Dirksen, and Dr. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 5:50 pm
The cases were filed by: A medical transcriptionist terminated for tardiness and absenteeism due to her obsessive-compulsive disorder (Humphrey v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 6:42 am
In this context, he referred to several long lasting cases, including Arcol v Capol (T-402/07, T-164/02, C-193/09) which took over 14 years until a final decision was reached. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 6:00 pm
The latest decision in our old friend, Astiana v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 2:43 pm
Humphrey. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 2:00 am
” In a case that I was involved in, Brawer v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 1:37 pm
Thompson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:34 pm
Tami Parr of the Pacific Northwest Cheese Association portended regulatory changes that may affect the fate of raw milk cheeses on her blog earlier last month. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 4:36 am
Yet, in Humphrey v. [read post]
