Search for: "Herring v. Humphrey"
Results 141 - 160
of 222
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm
Carroll, and that he spoke falsely with actual malice and lied when accusing her of fabricating her account and impugning her motives” (emphasis added for clarity). [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm
Humphrey, which bars civil suits about convictions that have not been reversed, expunged or declared invalid, count as “strikes” under the PLRA. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:30 pm
Humphrey. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 5:30 am
In Myers v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 11:22 am
In a case Alamillo cited in his appeal, Humphrey v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 11:22 am
In a case Alamillo cited in his appeal, Humphrey v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 10:38 pm
Castillo v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:50 pm
Sal Humphreys. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court case, Christie v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
Humphrey, 14-8349, asks whether the “Georgia courts err[ed] in failing to recognize race discrimination under Batson in the extraordinary circumstances of this death penalty case. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 12:42 pm
Acevedo v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
In Winfield v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:30 am
The court refers to the CJEU case C 251/95 SABEL BV v Puma AG, Rudolf Dassler Sport, 11 November 1997 to hold that the mere association which the public might make between two trademarks as a result of their analogous semantic content is not in itself a sufficient ground for concluding that there is a likelihood of confusion. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 12:39 am
Conversely, to the recent case Coty v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 3:41 am
This was clarified in L’ Oreal SA v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Schmidlin v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
City of New London generated four dissents, including one by Justice O’Connor that indicated her clear change of heart from what went before, even though she distanced herself from her earlier Midkiff opinion without disavowing it. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am
Bogan v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:54 am
FIRP; Court of Milan, 5 July 2017, Advachem v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 2:41 pm
 Kagan insisted that Sarbanes-Oxley does not "go an inch further" in limiting presidential power than the Court had gone in the 1935 precedent in Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
