Search for: "Highway Department v. Branch" Results 21 - 40 of 82
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2019, 9:05 pm by Marissa Martino Golden
For example, in Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:25 pm by David Gallacher and Bryce Chadwick
Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), etc.). [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“In January 2012, the plaintiff purchased a penthouse apartment on the seventh floor of a condominium located at 390 Kings Highway in Brooklyn. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
Wisconsin has enacted an “implied consent” law that provides that “[a]ny person who … drives or operates a motor vehicle upon the public highways of this state … is deemed to have given consent to one or more tests of his or her breath, blood or urine” for purposes of determining the presence of alcohol or controlled substances in their system. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Paul Rosenzweig
The Supreme Court will decide in the Carpenter v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:30 am by Jane Chong
But the Miami-Dade County Attorney correctly points out that certain executive branch departments and agencies tasked with administering the grants “wield considerable sway over their allocation” by the terms of the authorizing legislation. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 10:00 pm by Coral Beach
G, 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway, Kailua-Kona; and Friday, Dec. 9, from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. for Island of Kauai — Lihue Health Center Conference Room, 3040 Umi St., Lihue. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
The VRA is an obscure federal law known only to Appointment Gnomes in the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel (I was one), angry members of Congress who swear that the executive branch is abusing the act, and the acting officials who serve tenuously under it. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 10:19 am by John Eastman
As it noted all the way back in 1838 in Kendall v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm by Peter L. Strauss
Do we really need to be concerned that newspapers and the public misunderstand United States v. [read post]