Search for: "Hile v State"
Results 101 - 120
of 693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2023, 4:54 am
Cos. v Carbone, 85 AD3d 1110, 1111 [2d Dept 2011]. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:08 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
But as Judge Callahan points out, "[w]hile the Court found that heightened judicial scrutiny of the law was required, the Court did not actually apply heightened scrutiny. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 9:53 am
[W]hile it may be possible for an entire industry to be in violation of the [FLSA] for a long time without the Labor Department noticing, the more plausible hypothesis is that the Department did not think the industry's practice was unlawful. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
Agency v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 5:25 am
“[W]hile a league may wish to impose a salary cap on its member teams in order to promote parity, an $80 million cap on gross pay in California will not be the same as an $80 million cap on gross pay in Texas. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 12:59 pm
Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Limited v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 10:00 pm
In Luckey v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am
Subscript Law has a graphic explainer for Monday’s opinion in Gamble v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:40 pm
The case of Yvietta Matison v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 5:22 am
” Paco v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:32 pm
" He also concluded that the State voluntarily changed its position, stating that "[w]hile it may be true that this court's involvement aided in the resolution of the constitutional issues between the parties, the fact remains that the issues were not resolved as the result of a court order. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am
In Rubin v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:57 pm
In Hurley v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:49 am
Chamber of Commerce's lawsuit against the NLRB, Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:23 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:25 am
Beshear and Roberts v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:30 pm
In Mendez v May, 2015 WL 143965 (D. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:24 am
On April 2, 2010, United States Magistrate Judge Barbara Major issued a decision which may end a two-year discovery battle about whether sanctions should be imposed on six attorneys in Qualcomm v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 10:28 am
In United States v. [read post]
