Search for: "Hiles v. STATE COMPENSATION DEPARTMENT" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2020, 1:15 am by petrocohen
” Recently, the New Jersey Department of Labor & Workforce Development secured an important victory on behalf of truck drivers in the state. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:56 am
A settlement of a disciplinary action should be memorialize in writingWinkler v Kingston Housing Auth., 259 AD2d 819A public employee who faces disciplinary charges may enter into a settlement agreement that disposes the charges, so long as the waiver is knowingly and intelligently undertaken and serves as the consideration for the curtailment of pending disciplinary proceedings [see Whitehead v State of New York Department of Mental Hygiene, 71 AD2d 653]. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 12:20 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
Unfortunately, the Department seems uninterested in learning whether a compensation scheme would save lives — or have ill or counterproductive effects — or not. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 10:33 am by petrocohen
The award-winning workers’ compensation team includes Frank Petro, who heads Petro Cohen’s Workers’ Comp Department, as well as Stephen M. [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:53 pm by petrocohen
Our Workers’ Compensation Department is headed by founding partner Frank A. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Conversation, Kevin Johnson finds it “telling” that, in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 5:51 am
Further, “[w]hile the State legitimately may impose damages for the consequences of violent conduct, it may not award compensation for the consequences of nonviolent, protected activity. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am by steven perkins
[w]hile we cannot erase the scourges or broken promises of our past, we will move ahead together in writing a new, brighter chapter in our joint history.? [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
July 1, 2018Appellate Division, First DepartmentFirst Department Holds Brooke’s Reasoning Applies with Equal Force Where Child Is Legally Adopted by One Partner and Other Partner Claims He or She Is A AParent@With Co‑Equal Rights Because Of Preadoption Agreement. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
July 1, 2018Appellate Division, First DepartmentFirst Department Holds Brooke’s Reasoning Applies with Equal Force Where Child Is Legally Adopted by One Partner and Other Partner Claims He or She Is A AParent@With Co‑Equal Rights Because Of Preadoption Agreement. [read post]
In a memorandum explaining the company’s position, UnitedHealthcare stated that “[w]hile coupons may appear to be beneficial to members, they ultimately add costs back into the healthcare system by circumventing tiered PDLs that encourage use of lower cost medications. [read post]