Search for: "Hill v. Bradford"
Results 1 - 20
of 88
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2016, 9:07 am
Austin Bradford Hill, “The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 5:52 am
Bradford Hill, “Smoking and Carcinoma of the Lung,” 2 Br. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:00 am
Carthan, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an… [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 9:58 am
Goldstein to apply the Bradford-Hill criteria. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
”[1] In other words, before we even embark on consideration of Bradford Hill’s nine considerations, we should have ruled out chance, bias, and confounding as an explanation for the claimed association.[2] Although confounding is sometimes considered as a type of systematic bias, its importance warrants its own category. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm
Cranor, and David Gee, “The Use and Misuse of Bradford Hill in U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:30 pm
” Austin Bradford Hill, “The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:19 pm
DeLuca v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:56 pm
Kramer also asserted that she used a “weight-of-evidence assessment,” which included a consideration of Bradford Hill’s criteria for judging causality. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
Carl, et al. v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 1:25 pm
Kramer and Frazier never got off the dime with the Bradford Hill guidelines. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 12:29 pm
Gannon v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:27 pm
Neugebauer's findings using the evaluation scheme propounded by Sir Austin Bradford Hill, a well-known epidemiologist and biostatistician. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
Calling Jewell’s supposed method WOE or Bradford Hill or WOE/Bradford Hill did not cure the “fatal methodological flaws in his opinions. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
As with any methodology, the Bradford Hill factors are not self-executing. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 6:07 am
Bradford Hills HOA, No. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
“Then time will tell just who fellAnd who’s been left behind” Dylan, “Most Likely You Go Your Way” (1966) When the Daubert case headed to the Supreme Court, it had 22 amicus briefs in tow. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:35 pm
The Bradford Hill factors can be disregarded. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 10:28 am
Mead and Bradford S. [read post]
