Search for: "Hoar v. Hoar"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2008, 2:58 am
I was at a conference yesterday, which is why I didn't blog about yesterday's Lords judgment in A v Hoare and related appeals, in which they ruled that civil claims for damages can be made out of time in some circumstances in cases of rape and sexual assault. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:49 am
Hoare and Lister v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:20 am
That would have been the end of the matter, but for the House of Lords, which decided in the combined case of A v Hoare to reverse its own decision in Stubbings (1COR’s Lizanne Gumbel QC was for most of the appellants although not Mr Hoare). [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 10:27 pm
A v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 3:40 am
A landmark decision of the House of Lords in A v Hoare [2008] UKHL 6 may mean that insurers covering UK employers for similar abuse claims will begin to share the US's experience.A v Hoare concerned the limitation period applicable to cases of sexual abuse. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 9:08 am
Hoare. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 12:32 pm
The Holy Roman Emperor Maximillian I had just died, and his grandson Charles V was about to be crowed in Aachen as his successor. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:53 pm
Ben Hoare Bell Solicitors & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v The Lord Chancellor [2015] EWHC 523 (Admin) The legal aid funding regulations for judicial reviews, in effect from April 2014, were the subject of this judicial review. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 9:05 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) The Ministry of Justice v Prison Officers Association (POA) [2008] EWHC 239 (QB) (18 February 2008) Crystal Palace FC (2000) Ltd. v Dowie [2008] EWHC 240 (QB) (18 February 2008) Newton-Sealey v Armorgroup Services Ltd & Ors [2008] EWHC 233 (QB) (14 February 2008) HM Revenue & Customs v James (t/a M&D Enterprise) [2008] EWHC 230 (QB) (14 February 2008) Brampton v Rust & Anor… [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:29 am
(Rev 3) [2012] EWCA Crim 1456 (04 July 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Secretary of State for Home Department v AM [2012] EWHC 1854 (Admin) (06 July 2012) The College of Naturopathic Medicine Ltd (CNM), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 1) [2012] EWHC 1851 (Admin) (05 July 2012) FGP v Serco Plc & Anor [2012] EWHC 1804 (Admin) (05 July 2012) High Court (Commercial Court) Sibir Energy Ltd v Tchigirinski & Ors… [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 2:21 am
A similar conclusion was reached in March of last year by the High Court in a claim brought by a number of firms of solicitors (R (Ben Hoare Bell and Ors) v Lord Chancellor [2015] EWHC 523 (Admin)) who contended that regulations made under LASPO introducing the “no permission, no fee” arrangement in applications for judicial review were significantly outwith the purpose of LASPO since their application in some situations could not in any sense incentivise providers to a… [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 2:49 pm
Hoar, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 2:56 am
In Actavis v Lilly, Lord Neuberger was keen to follow Germany, which was subsequently watered down in Warner Lambert and, now, more so. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 1:04 pm
In the recent case (Hung v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 4:05 am
Hoare (click here to review our previous blog post). [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
This changed with the decision of the House of Lords in Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd [2002] 1 AC 215. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 11:39 am
In today’s case (Blaikie v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
The most celebrated argument for why Brown v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 12:44 pm
And in 1926, Supreme Court Chief Justice William Howard Taft said in Myers v. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 8:55 am
"That quote is also interesting with a view to the recently-filed Intel and Apple v. [read post]
