Search for: "Hoffman v City of New York" Results 1 - 20 of 101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2010, 7:01 am
In an article I wrote last May, Employees Working in Other States Can Sue Under New York's Anti-Discrimination Laws, I discussed Hoffman v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 12:16 pm
Parade moved to dismiss the claim on grounds that New York court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, since the termination did not occur in New York City or New York State citing Shah v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 5:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
When he lost his job, Howard Hoffman--a Georgia resident who worked in Parade Magazine's Atlanta office--filed an age-discrimination claim against the company under both the New York City and New York State Human Rights Laws. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 6:16 pm by ALeonard
This was apparently influenced as well by a recent New York State Appellate Division ruling in Hoffman v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 6:30 am by GGCRBHS&M
Two people died and 9 were injured in a fire accident in New York City. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While most of the underlying causes of action were time-barred before the plaintiff retained the [*2]defendants, the plaintiff's claim under 42 USC § 1983 arising from malicious prosecution was viable at the time the defendants commenced the federal action on the plaintiff's behalf (see Palmer v State of New York, 57 AD3d 364, 364; Pendelton v City of New York, 44 AD3d 733, 737). [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 12:17 pm
The proprietary lease at issue in the Hoffman case is very similar to most proprietary leases in New York City. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:31 pm
Only the union or the employer may demand that an issue be submitted to arbitrationNew York City Tr. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Bhd. of Teamsters v City of New York, 64 NY2d 188, the court opined that a union’s breach of its duty of fair representation occurs only when a union's conduct toward a member of the collective bargaining unit is arbitrary, discriminatory, or its decision was made in bad faith.In Garvin v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While most of the underlying causes of action were time-barred before the plaintiff retained the [*2]defendants, the plaintiff's claim under 42 USC § 1983 arising from malicious prosecution was viable at the time the defendants commenced the federal action on the plaintiff's behalf (see Palmer v State of New York, 57 AD3d 364, 364; Pendelton v City of New York, 44 AD3d 733, 737). [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 10:46 am
The Art World Is No Longer A Quiet Place Decades ago, a former counsel for the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City commented that transactions in the art world are generally very "hush-hush" and have always been that way. [read post]