Search for: "Hoffman v. Department of Corrections"
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 12:44 pm
Parra (Jose) v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:37 am
Hoffman, 422 U.S. 454 (1975); to misdemeanors (unless accompanied by prison terms for violators), U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
The Regional Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Jabalpur(1976) 4 SCC 124 this court held that the doctrine of stare decisis is a very valuable principle of precedent which cannot be departed from unless there are extraordinary or special reasons to do so. [read post]
7 May 2011, 2:40 am
See Ryan v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 2:07 pm
James Landolt v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:14 am
Dist., 34 S.W.3d at 556; Osborne, 177 S.W.2d at 200; Hoffman v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
The General Municipal Law Section 207-a/c Case BookA Guide to Disability Leave for those involved inLaw Enforcement and Firefighting in New York State2009 Edition, 1098 pagesThe Section 207-a/c Case Book is an electronic handbook for administrators, union officials and attorneys involved with General Municipal Law Sections 207-a and 207-c benefits available to law enforcement personnel and firefighters suffering job related injuries. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
Hoffman, published before 1923, should be sufficient to condemn the authors’ carelessness to the dustbin of occupational history.[4] The bibliographies in both these monographs document the widespread interest in, and awareness of, the occupational hazards of silica dusts, going back into the 19th century, among the media, the labor movement, and the non-industrial scientific community. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
Department of Social Services. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
Department of Social Services. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
In addition, unlike Justice Hoffman in Improver, Binnie J. did not provide specific questions, answers and directions as to how essentiality or non-essentiality were to be determined in applying the test. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Virginia v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:28 pm
Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc., which departed from all existing case law at that moment.[22] In Molecular Diagnostics, the plaintiff, a direct purchaser of the subject patented product, brought suit under Section 1 of the Sherman Act charging that it had been forced to pay artificially inflated prices for the product as a result of defendants' enforcement of the patent, which plaintiffs allege was obtained by fraud on the PTO. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 12:01 am
Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm
Doe A. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
Schnitzer, of Hoffman-La Roche. 1955. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
was of course correct on this limited point, but generally in this field, peer review is worth a warm bucket of spit. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
Subchapter V – Return to Work Reporting Requirement Employers have a method to report if an employee refuses to return to work Plain language about returning to work Subchapter VI – Other Related Provisions and Technical Corrections Pay an extra $100 per week to individuals who have at least $5,000 a year in self-employment income, but are disqualified from receiving Pandemic Unemployment Assistance because they are not eligible for regular state unemployment… [read post]
