Search for: "Hoffman v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 1,042
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2023, 9:37 am by Curtis Bradley, Jack Goldsmith
The Supreme Court seemed to go out of its way in American Insurance Association v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
  JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
May, President of the Free State Foundation In West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Goldfarb v Hoffman, 139 AD3d 474, 475 [1st Dept 2016]; Cascardo v Dratel, 171 AD3d 561, 562 [1st Dept 2019]; see CPLR 3211[a][1], [7]). [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 5:59 am by Just Security
Parachini The Just Security Podcast: United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 7:01 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
"David Hoffman moderates a discussion between Compassion & Choices lawyer Kevin Diaz and physician Nicholas Gideonse who successfully challenged Oregon's residency requirement.Oregon recently amended its residency requirement for patients seeking aid-in-dying in the settlement that decided Gideonse v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 4:44 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In the resulting decision, Freedom Holding, Inc. v Haart (2022 NY Slip Op 22225 [Sup Ct, NY County July 20, 2022]), Justice Hoffman rejected Haart’s assertion that Delaware law applied across the board to Freedom and Scaglia’s claims simply by virtue of the entity’s incorporation in Delaware. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 2:02 pm
We should not lightly attribute that intent to the Legislature, particularly given California’s “strong public policy to protect children of tender years” (People v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 6:48 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, 580 F.3d 1340, 1365–67 (Fed. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 8:35 am by HRWatchdog
Just weeks after the United States Supreme Court confirmed in an 8-1 decision that a plaintiff whose individual claims are compelled to arbitration loses standing to serve as a PAGA plaintiff on behalf of other employees’ claims, the California Supreme Court granted review in Adolph v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
From that it follows that it is impermissible to base state policies on claimsabout the divine will. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:13 am by Peter Mahler
In its unanimous decision handed down last week in Matter of Hoffman v S.T.H.M. [read post]