Search for: "Holder v. Smith" Results 201 - 220 of 576
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2023, 6:15 am by Florian Mueller
Of course, such decisions can and this one is indeed going to be appealed--which is also a safe assumption with respect to an even higher-profile recent FRAND ruling by the same court, Mr Justice Marcus Smith's Optis v. [read post]
The decision was a departure from decades of jurisprudence, which previously held that voluntarily providing your information to a third party was a forfeiture of a legitimate expectation of privacy, as in the 1979 case of Smith v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 6:33 pm by Dennis Crouch
Six years ago, Representative Smith introduced the Patent Reform Act of 2005. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:01 pm by Bexis
Lexis 1688, at *25-26 n.8 (citing Wyeth v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 11:48 am
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, December 09, 2009 Holder v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:05 pm by Amy Howe
” Ian Smith weighs in on Evenwel v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:48 am by Don Cruse
Smith Production Inc., No. 09-0270 (docket and briefs):1 “The principal issue is whether the standard form joint-operating agreement allows a non-operating oil-and-gas interest-holder to change its election regarding a drilling proposal when the change is within the agreement’s 30-day response period. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:00 am
Stuart considered that five years is not necessarily too long for a mark holder to claim a monopoly right if there is a genuine intention to use the mark. [read post]