Search for: "Holmes v. Fell"
Results 41 - 60
of 81
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2013, 10:14 am
This week in Gunn v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
There was no reason to exclude cases which fell within the ambit of the literal words of Reg 8(2)vi) In the present case, the review officer had rejected the original decision that Mr M was intentionally homeless, but confirmed the decision that Mr M did not have priority need. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
There was no reason to exclude cases which fell within the ambit of the literal words of Reg 8(2)vi) In the present case, the review officer had rejected the original decision that Mr M was intentionally homeless, but confirmed the decision that Mr M did not have priority need. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
One of them fell by the wayside (Manchester v Mushin), while another has been granted PTA to the Supreme Court, but has been stayed pending the outcome of these cases (Salford v Mullen - the lead case in the Court of Appeal, somewhat bizarrely as Salford weren't even represented there). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
One of them fell by the wayside (Manchester v Mushin), while another has been granted PTA to the Supreme Court, but has been stayed pending the outcome of these cases (Salford v Mullen - the lead case in the Court of Appeal, somewhat bizarrely as Salford weren't even represented there). [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
Marbury v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
Thus a local authority which resolved to use section 17(6) of the Children Act 1989 in all cases which fell foul of section 185(4) of the Housing Act 1996 would in my judgment be [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
Thus a local authority which resolved to use section 17(6) of the Children Act 1989 in all cases which fell foul of section 185(4) of the Housing Act 1996 would in my judgment be [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 3:43 pm
The Recorder fell into error in finding to the contrary.Mr B argued that the Recorder had reached the right decision. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 3:43 pm
The Recorder fell into error in finding to the contrary.Mr B argued that the Recorder had reached the right decision. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 2:58 pm
Familiar examples, to name just a few, include Justice Harlan's famous dissenting opinion in Plessy v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm
I didn’t expect it to happen in one fell swoop,” Ginsburg later said. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
”[37] With respect to the first two mailings promoting the sale of products, the Court held that these easily fell “within the core notion of commercial speech—speech which does no more than [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:16 am
In Walton v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
” [Abrams v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm
As Lord Mansfield said in 1769, in the case of R. v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 8:15 am
Hollis v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
In, Graney v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
In, Graney v. [read post]
