Search for: "Holmes v. Phillips" Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
12 Nov 2006, 6:55 am
Holmes and the Application of State Constitutional Uniformity Clauses to School Voucher Schemes, 35 Journal of Law & Education 415-459 (2006).Vincent Phillip Munoz, The Original Meaning of the Establishment Clause and the Impossibility of Its Incorporation, 8 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 585-639 (2006).Barak Medina, Enhancing Freedom of Religion Through Public Provision of Religious Services: The Israeli Experience, 39 Israel Law Review 127-157… [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 6:11 am by David Bernstein
The title speaks for itself.Michael Phillips, The Lochner Court, Myth and Reality: Substantive Due Process from the 1890s to the 1930s. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:30 pm
Slip op. at 26.For those who thought that the Supreme Court might have backed away from excessiveness Due Process review in the recent Phillip Morris v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Phillips, No. 07-0522 Grant of habeas petition ordering conviction be vacated based on state's Brady violation is vacated in part as to barring of retrial of count of depraved indifference murder as petitioner had not exhausted his state remedies with respect to that relief. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am by INFORRM
Pinterest.com and copyright, Lucy Holmes Plovnick, Intellectual Copyright Magazine [subscribers only]. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
[We grateful to Victoria Saker Woeste of the American Bar Foundation (vswoeste@abfn.org) for this full report of an excellent conference. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]