Search for: "Holt v. May" Results 41 - 60 of 352
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2014, 1:10 pm by DMLP Staff
On December 11, 2010, Conway posted on her Twitter account: "Mara Feld aka Gina Holt - you are fucking crazy! [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:10 pm by DMLP Staff
On December 11, 2010, Conway posted on her Twitter account: "Mara Feld aka Gina Holt - you are fucking crazy! [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 11:57 am by Alham Chelehmalzadeh
Holt decision was released on May 28, 2010 from the Court of the Queen’s Bench of Alberta in Calgary. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
On the other hand, counseling letters may not be used as a subterfuge for avoiding initiating formal disciplinary action against a tenured individual.The decisions of the Commissioner of Education in Fusco v Jefferson County School District, CEd, 14,396, and Irving v Troy City School District, CEd 14,373, are instructive in this regard. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:05 pm
The basic rule set out in Holt is that a statutory disciplinary provision such as Section 75 of the Civil Service Law does not require that an employee be given a hearing or permitted to grieve every comment or statement by his or her employer that he or she may consider a criticism. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 12:58 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
William Holt, II, No. 113,990 (Shawnee)Sentencing appealMeryl Carver-AllmondImproper restitution findingState v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 1:13 pm by David Oscar Markus
The justices will meet together again during their closed-door conference in Washington on May 12. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:21 am by Rosalind English
On 12 March 2014, the Supreme Court gave judgment in the case of R (BSkyB) v Commissioner of Police [2014] UKSC 17. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 4:19 am
Eighteen new cases were designated to the Business Court during the month of May 2009. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:17 am by K&L Gates
May 17, 2011), a case addressing recovery of e-discovery costs, and Steuben Foods, Inc. v. [read post]