Search for: "Home News Pub. v. Dept. of Health"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
At the core of these principles is an important new one, though one that waits for greater elaboration elsewhere--the need for reasoned decision making subject to broad review by the courts (e.g., Dept of Commerce v, NY, No. 18–966. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
* The decision, City of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:29 am
Phibro Animal Health Corp., 460 N.J. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:56 pm
Pub. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 11:20 am
[iii] Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Pub. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
City of New York framework to analyze his takings claim. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
(CEQA; Pub. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:29 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run March 23, 2008. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
After the cottage was demolished, Petitioners requested approval of a Coastal Development Permit (“CDP”) to construct a new single family home on the now vacant lot. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
WA Dept. of Soc. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
& Health Servs. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 8:27 am
The construction of new roads actually induces more travel and overall, congestion is either no better or even worse then previously experienced. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
(CEQA; Pub. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Exemptions Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Exemptions Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. [read post]
