Search for: "Hook v. Hook" Results 41 - 60 of 2,692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2021, 6:20 am
  The patent in suit was for a hangable garden hook which was granted under number GB2552562B,  Janger accused Tesco of infringing claims 1, 4 [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 6:13 am
A train passed and the plaintiff was struck by something sticking out from the train (either a hook or a door…) So of course, Professor V pulls up a slide ... [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:57 am
Given the dangers and concerns that have been outlined, I think not,” he wrote in Bird v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 12:22 am
The First District Court of Appeal ruled Wednesday in Hooks v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 4:03 pm by James M. Beard
 All hooks, safety hooks, lines, and controls should be kept in safe operating order. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 10:12 am by Tom Smith
The justices did not include any comment about the case, Remington Arms Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 8:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled 7-6, en banc, in Van Hook v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
And now we have a Tax Court decision, in Senyszyn v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:04 am
In the recent case of Tony Hook v British Airways plc (2011) EWHC 379 (QB), the High Court was asked to consider whether UK and EU aviation legislation created a private law cause of action sounding in damages in relation to alleged disability discrimination by an airline.The appellant, Mr Hook, who suffered from mobility and learning difficulties, appealed against a decision striking out his claim for damages for injury to his feelings arising from the alleged failure of… [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 9:45 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In contrast with claim 22, which asconstrued recites nothing more than a desired result andan instruction to apply Hooke’s law, we cannot say claim 1as construed is directed to a particular natural law andnothing more. [read post]