Search for: "House v. Erwin"
Results 1 - 20
of 79
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2024, 12:28 pm
See Spears v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Michaels Professor of Law UCLA School of Law Timothy Naftali Senior Research Scholar Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs Victoria Nourse Ralph V. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
Apprendi, Jr. shot several bullets into the house of the only Black family in town. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
In Kisor v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 5:35 am
Lutz v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
In City of Richmond v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:06 pm
One of the most famous censorship cases to land in the courts is United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
Maryland, Martin v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 6:40 am
This week, Senate and House members have introduced a bill to impose term limits, regularized confirmation schedules, and other changes. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 8:52 am
Last year, House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., Sen. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 4:36 am
In 1892, the Supreme Court upheld Reed’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 5:42 am
[If anything, Josh was too gentle on Dean Erwin Chemerinsky's latest op-ed.] [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 8:24 am
Dean Erwin Chemerinsky’s essay addresses Bush v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
(We all remember how a tight timeline affected the quality of judicial work product in complicated election matters in Bush v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 4:36 pm
BrazilAttorney General v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 9:35 am
The "equal suffrage" references in Article V of the Constitution is that of states, not of state populations. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:10 am
Attorney Gen. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Today marks the 50th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:05 pm
Erwin Chemerinsky told me that he’d learned to use technology in the classroom specifically so he could share parts of the show with students. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
How is this relevant for California v. [read post]