Search for: "House v. SSA"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2012, 10:04 am
In Lee v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:10 pm
The previous No-Match procedure was that if the W-2 information that the employer submitted did not match SSA records, the SSA sent an “Employer Correction Request” also referred to as a “code v” or “no-match” letter, informing the employer of the discrepancy. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 2:41 pm
"), the security guard company, its parent ("ABM"), and its predecessor ("SSA, LLC") (collectively, the "Corporate Defendants") on allegations of violations of the Fair Housing Act, Maryland Fair Housing Law, 42 USC §1982, 42 USC §1985(3), and claims of tortious inference with contract and IIED. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:37 am
Additional Resources: Social Security wants Ames to pay 40-year-old bill, November 12, 2015, Mail Tribune, by Damian Mann More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:36 pm
” Although the Court’s ruling in FAA v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:42 am
Supreme Court’s 1999 ruling in Cleveland v. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 9:10 am
A couple of years prior, in 2011, a Democratic House of Representatives member, Heath Shuler, tried as well to sponsor a bill ending the wait, but his bill also died in committee. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:35 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 7:49 am
T.C. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 4:25 am
Additional Resources: Syracuse man uses 2 Social Security numbers to defraud government out of $87,000, June 8, 2016, Syracuse.Com, By John O’Brien More Blog Entries: Allensworth v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 10:56 pm
Social Security Deputy Commissioner David V. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:09 pm
Social Security Deputy Commissioner David V. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 5:36 am
HADDEN, VERNON V. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 7:00 am
Since you need SSI payments to support yourself, the Supreme Court of Arkansas held in Davis v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
Salas v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Mott MacDonald Ltd v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 3:01 am
See, e.g., Levinson v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 4:00 am
The individual, employed by the New York City Housing Authority, had violated the Authority's written policy prohibiting its staff members running for political office in a partisan election.Noting that “It is well settled that "[v]iolation of an employer's reasonable policies may constitute disqualifying misconduct," the Appellate Division said that the Authority’s guidelines were established “to assure compliance with the Hatch Act (5… [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:35 am
The United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
The latest chapter is Biestek v. [read post]
