Search for: "Housing Authority v. Peters" Results 81 - 100 of 673
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm by INFORRM
 These are helpfully summarised by Peter Jukes on his blog. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 7:00 am by Jonathan Shaub
The individual does not have the authority to waive that privilege, and agency regulations, called Touhy regulations after the Supreme Court case Touhy v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 29 June 2017 the Culture Secretary Karen Bradley made a statement to the House of Commons stating that she was “minded” to refer the proposed takeover of Sky plc by 21st Century Fox Inc to the Competition and Markets Authority on plurality grounds. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Mr James has brought a counterclaim for libel, funded by the local authority. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:15 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
In last week’s judgment in Assange v The Swedish Prosecution Authority [2012] UKSC 22, the Supreme Court decided that the words ‘judicial authority’ in s 2(2) of the Extradition Act 2003 include prosecutors as well as courts. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 8:02 am by Elliot Setzer
Circuit ruling in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 6:32 am by Garrett Hinck
Kahn flagged Judge Cooper’s latest opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 9:51 am by Benjamin Pollard
Benjamin Pollard shared a livestream of the eighth in a series of hearings held by the House Select Committee to Investigate the Jan. 6th Attack on the U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:41 am by Rosalind English
Sharon Shoesmith’s court action over her sacking by Haringey Council has once more brought to the fore the sorry account of neglect and mismanagement by police and local authorities of that led to the death of baby Peter Connelly (‘Baby P’). [read post]
There have been quite a few “Halliburton” appeals in the last couple of decades and at least one example in the House of Lords/Supreme Court (Conor v Angiotech [2008]). [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 6:28 am
On the first point, the judge referred to the Court of Appeal in Patrick John Brain v Ingledew Brown Bennison & Grant [1996] FSR 341 as authority for the principle that the cause of action under Section 70(1) is available for such threats. [read post]