Search for: "Howard v. Place" Results 1 - 20 of 957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Howard Everson opine that "standardized tests are neither designed nor intended to select students for specialized academic programs (the way they are utilized in admissions screens). [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Howard Everson opine that "standardized tests are neither designed nor intended to select students for specialized academic programs (the way they are utilized in admissions screens). [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 8:02 am by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:10 am by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:00 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
They claim that heis therefore not a qualified candidate, and that as a result,the Colorado secretary of state may not place him on theprimary ballot. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The second part explores the mind, representative opinions, and remarkable non-judicial achievements of Chief Justice William Howard Taft from his ascension to the center chair in 1921 to his death in 1930. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Other scenarios: Howard University Alumni Association should be understood as NFU outside the scope of dilution, as long as it’s a truthful representation—it’s not using Howard as a mark but rather the unitary mark Howard University Alumni Association; the exclusion doesn’t, like other parts of the statute, refer to uses “comprising” the famous mark. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Consider, for instance, the end of the Court’s per curiam opinion in Bush v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:56 pm by luiza
 The allegations originated in a whistleblower lawsuit filed by former KBR employees Geoffrey Howard and Zella Hemphill Anderson. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
"[7] The brief quotes part of Senator Howard's speech,[8] but it misses Howard's central point. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:13 am by Dan Bressler
It is not Shrensky’s place to step in and assert their rights. [read post]