Search for: "Howe v. Disciplinary Board"
Results 21 - 40
of 553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2017, 10:03 am
Assn., 49 Ohio St.3d 129 (1990) (presumption of validity of an arbitrator’s award) Board of Trustees of Miami Township v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 4:11 am
But then, how did Mark V. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 8:34 am
The Court of Appeals agrees that plaintiff cannot sue the city.The case is Outlaw v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 2:32 pm
From Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:25 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court issued its ruling in North Carolina Department of Corrections v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
"How do you think the high court will decide Schenectady's appeal, and why? [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 9:50 am
" The Court cites Smith v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 11:35 am
Brockler did not disclose how he obtained that information.Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 2:00 am
Terra Nova Employers’ Organization v Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union, Local 2121, 2018 NLCA 7 (CanLII) [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:10 am
” The opinion then states: “This Court is most perplexed by how legitimate concern for the safety of the firefighters volunteering to respond to emergencies and the taxpayers the Respondents serve comes to be characterized as defamation. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 7:51 am
Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board, et al. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 11:12 am
Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 10:51 am
Bangs lost the internal disciplinary hearing over the Spam incident and the prison told the Parole Board that Bangs should not receive early release through parole after all. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 6:17 pm
William (V - Western Michigan)Tuttle, The Rev. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 4:39 am
In NLRB v. [read post]
Case preview: Greater Glasgow Health Board (Appellant) v Doogan and another (Respondents) (Scotland)
11 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
However the Scottish appeal in the case of Doogan v Greater Glasgow Health Board, which is being heard today, raises the controversial issue of the scope of section 4 of the Abortion Act 1967 (the “Act”). [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:31 am
As to a court's authority to overturn or modify an administrative disciplinary decision or a disciplinary penalty imposed on a worker, the Court of Appeals, in its March 22, 2001 decision in Kelly v Safir, 96 N.Y.2d 32, [decided with Elliott v City of New York], said that: 1.The courts may not modify such a determination if substantial evidence supports it; and 2.A court must uphold an administrative penalty unless it finds that it is so disproportionate to… [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:12 am
May 9, 2022 | Aborting the Right to Abortion | A leaked draft of a Supreme Court opinion turns the national debate over Roe v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
Itawamba School Board, supra.When members of the Disciplinary Committee asked Bell about his “intentions” withrespect to the song and whether the violent lyrics reflected an intention to harm the coaches. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:30 am
It may well have happened with last week’s decision in Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
