Search for: "Hughes v. Design Look Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 75
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
” Here are a couple of recent ones that looked interesting to us.Tort Liability and Medical InnovationThe first one is Anna B. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
Supp.2d 439, 445 (D.N.J. 2003); Hughes v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 7:32 am
Halo Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
--Elements of Law 3.0: On the Relevance of a First Year Law Course Designed to Frame the Law School Curriculum). [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
Medtronic, Inc., U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:24 am
The Coleman decision also contains a lengthy discussion of preemption law, but with cites to Stengel, Hughes v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
The IPKat has stumbled across a decision earlier this year from the Federal Court, Canada, in Pfizer Canada Inc. v Pharmascience Inc. 2013 FC 120, dating back to 4 February. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 12:33 pm
Elliott v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 2:09 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 522 U.S. 312 (2008). [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
In addition, Havner requires that a plaintiff show ‘that he or she is similar to [the subjects] in the studies’ and that ‘other plausible causes of the injury or condition that could be negated [are excluded] with reasonable certainty’.40” 347 S.W.3d at 265 (quoting from Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
’” This case, in turn, was cited by the Supreme Court in the 1984 Betamax case to support the idea that “The monopoly privileges that Congress may authorize are neither unlimited nor primarily designed to provide a special private benefit. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
He is currently working in a temporary capacity as he looks for a permanent legal position in some area of commercial transactional or intellectual property law. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Speaker: William F Patry (Chief Copyright Counsel, Google Inc.) [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
The court didn’t buy it. #2 — Hughes v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
Hughes v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:46 am
They are also now big, big litigation.You might think that last week's decision in Hughes v Mylan, Inc., 2011 U.S. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
Hughes, R.J. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
Path. et al. v. [read post]
