Search for: "Hughes v. Wilson"
Results 1 - 20
of 181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm
New from the University Press of Kansas: The First Modern Clash over Federal Power: Wilson versus Hughes in the Presidential Election of 1916 (2016), by Lewis L. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 5:03 pm
In the case of Brett Wilson LLP v Persons Unknown ([2015] EWHC 2628 (QB))(16 September 2015) Warby J granted a permanent injunction against the unknown operators of the “Solicitors from Hell UK” website. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:20 pm
UPDATE: If we limit ourselves to Wilson’s opponents in the 1912 and 1916 elections, Taft and Hughes were way better choices. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 1:01 am
After Hughes was defeated by Wilson, he returned to the practice of law. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
Wilson, Railroad Commission of Texas v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 4:57 pm
Citing Fleming v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:59 am
In delivering the judgment Lord Sumption stated that the Court of Appeal authority Borneman v Wilson (1884) 28 Ch D 53 suggests that a trustee in bankruptcy must either adopt proceedings in their entirety or not at all, even where there are discrete prior proceedings conducted by the bankrupt before his appointment. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 7:05 am
"In 1941, the year Hughes left the court, Chief Justice Roberts said, 'you had two senators on the court, a representative, three former attorneys general.' The court that decided Brown v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 4:44 pm
The full judgement (Smith v Backhouse [2023] [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:10 am
‘As Lord Wilson’s penetrating analysis clearly shows, a generalised statement of the conceptual basis for the doctrine under which illegality may bar a civil claim has always proved elusive’ (per Lord Hughes at [54]). [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 2:39 am
Three judges (Hale, Wilson, Clarke) retain the traditional broad common law view – the position in many Canadian provinces prior to Club Resorts Ltd v Van Breda, 2012 SCC 17 (available here) – that ongoing suffering in the forum in respect of a tort that happened abroad is sufficient. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 1:05 am
Lord Hughes gives a dissenting judgment. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:46 am
In July 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hughes) heard this appeal relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
In terms of materiality, he considered the House of Lords’ decision in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 9:45 am
In Wilson v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:22 pm
See Hughes Aircraft Co. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:49 am
Lords Neuberger, Clarke, Wilson, Toulson and Lady Hale will hear the appeal. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:07 am
The case was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed and Lord Hughes. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:34 am
Her appeal was unanimously allowed by LJs Hale, Clarke, Wilson, Hughes and Hodge. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:27 am
The lead judgment was given by Lord Wilson, with whom Lord Hodge and Lord Carnwath agreed; a concurring judgment was given by Lord Carnwath with whom Lord Reed and Lord Hughes agreed; a concurring judgment was also given by Lord Hodge with whom Lord Hughes agreed. [read post]
