Search for: "Humphrey v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 552
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am by ELEANOR MITCHELL
The Court of Appeal, relying on Lady Hale’s judgment in Humphreys v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2012] 1 WLR 1545, had considered that the case involved “discrimination in state benefits” and hence that the usually strict test for justification on grounds such as sex or disability gave way to the question of whether the Government’s approach was “manifestly without reasonable foundation”. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 7:02 am by Giles Peaker
 Stec applied  and Humphreys v Revenue and Customs Comrs [2012] 1 WLR 1545 approved. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am by MBettman
On July 28, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 1:49 pm by Sandy Levinson
Humphrey and that he is in fact qualified to be President of the United States with all of the powers that entails. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 8:06 am by Bill Marler
While covering these events, my blog has been inundated with comments expressing outrage at FDA and state regulators for raw milk cheese “crackdowns. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:10 am by Eleanor Mitchell, Matrix
This was the standard that had been applied in Burnip, and was said to find further support in the Supreme Court’s decision in Humphreys v Revenue and Customs Commissioners. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am by Robert B. Milligan
To learn more, please see our 50 State Non-Compete and Trade Secrets Desktop Reference. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 10:48 pm by Patricia Salkin
The court therefore affirmed, finding that the trial properly sustained the plaintiffs’ administrative appeal. 347 Humphrey Street, LLC v Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of New Haven, 2015 WL 5687733 (CT App. 10/6/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Variances [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, the court said that substantial evidence, "consists of proof within the whole record of such quality and quantity as to generate conviction in and persuade a fair and detached fact finder that, from that proof as a premise, a conclusion or ultimate fact may be extracted reasonably—probatively and logically. [read post]