Search for: "Humphrey v. USA"
Results 21 - 40
of 76
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2018, 12:02 am
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € Design Rights, Functionality and Scope of Protection by Chris Carani€ 199 The post USA: Excelled Sheepskin & Leather Coat Corp.… [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:08 am
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € Design Rights, Functionality and Scope of Protection by Chris Carani€ 199 The post USA: Real Foods Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 12:24 am
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € Design Rights, Functionality and Scope of Protection by Chris Carani€ 199 The post USA: Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision to dismiss an attorney’s challenge of his bar license suspension as the attorney’s procedural and substantive challenges to the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s disciplinary proceeding were rejected (Piccone v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
We AFFIRM 07a0126p.06 2007/04/06 USA v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 5:11 am
The court also affirmed two district court rulings on remedies; specifically, that FI is not entitled to recover JFTCO’s profits and that a permanent injunction precluding JFTCO from ever using the Fabick family name was not necessary (Fabick, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Humphrey; and (3) whether the Heck v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 12:55 am
Therefore the TTAB was correct in granting the petition of competitor Ambev S.A. to cancel the mark due to abandonment (Cervejaria Petropolis SA v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 12:32 am
In affirming a district court’s dismissal because use of the marks constituted nominative fair use, the appeals court concluded that Applied’s service was not readily identifiable without use of the trademarks, the seminar creators used only so much of the trademarks as was reasonably necessary, and use of the trademarks did not suggest sponsorship or endorsement (Applied Underwriters, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:34 am
The claims had been brought in good faith and the litigation was still at a very early stage (SnugglyCat, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 8:12 am
The district court erred when it adopted factual findings made by a magistrate judge while deciding a motion for summary judgment because the magistrate judge had weighed the evidence (Heron Development Corp. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:37 am
In affirming the federal district court’s dismissal of Neutron Depot’s suit alleging infringement of the INSURANCE DEPOT mark against Bankrate, the Fifth Circuit concluded that Neutron Depot did not own the mark outright at any point when the infringement took place (Neutron Depot, LLC v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 6:55 am
The Second Circuit affirmed the district court’s finding that there was no indication that the award was procured through fraud or dishonesty, or that any other basis for overturning the award existed (Landau v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 2:39 am
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € Design Rights, Functionality and Scope of Protection by Chris Carani€ 199 [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 5:16 am
While the plaintiff’s filing of an application to register the SULKA mark in the United States was “certainly relevant” to intent to market products in the United States, it had little bearing on his ability to expand his business to the United States (Selah v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:12 am
Not only did appellee’s arguments have virtually no likelihood of success because the seller had waived them, but its actions in bringing the appeal were found to be a tactic to draw out the proceedings as long as possible while knowing that it had no viable substantive defense (Quincy Bioscience, LLC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 12:50 am
The district court was instructed on remand to determine whether the retailer consented to the publication (Sleepy’s LLC v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 1:04 am
The Federal Circuit reversed the ITC’s determination that Laerdal failed to plead its trade dress claims with adequate detail, vacated the ITC’s decision that no relief was warranted, and remanded to the ITC to determine the appropriate remedy after consideration of public interest concerns (Laerdal Medical Corp. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:31 am
Fields Famous Brands, LLC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 1:00 am
The court remanded trademark infringement and other claims brought by dietary supplement seller Charles Curry to the federal district court in Chicago for further proceedings (Curry v. [read post]
