Search for: "Hutchinson v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Therefore, the Arbitrator did not usurp the exclusive prerogatives of a judge of the Superior Court. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:55 am by jonathanturley
The case involved an African-American defendant, Warren McCleskey, who was convicted of two counts of armed robbery and one count of murder in the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 7:42 am
This post examines a recent decision of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania: Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 11:42 pm by LTA-Editor
In coming to this conclusion, the District Court relied on Hutchison v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by Eric B. Meyer
In Smith v Hutchinson Plumbing Heating Cooling, the New Jersey Superior Court reaffirmed that a single comment, in this case a religious comment, can create a hostile work environment. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 2:57 am by Marie Louise
Sandoz, Inc (IPBiz) (Patent Docs) Plavix (Clopidogrel) – Brazil: Superior Court of Justice denies Plavix patent extension (IP tango) Prandin (Repaglinide) – US: Novo Nordisk and Sandoz settle infringement claims in Prandin dispute (Patent Docs) Prandin (Repaglinide) – US: Supreme Court petitioned to review Federal Circuit patent use code decision: Caraco v Novo Nordisk (FDA Law Blog) [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:00 am by Marie Louise
Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics (Pharma Patents) US: CAFC Affirms district court de novo review in section 146 action: Streck v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1351 n.2 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
Superior Court), given that the earlier trial was in the federal court system (the D.C. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
” The “objective partisan assumption” is that lawyers can make independent ethical evaluations of client behaviour, while also remaining loyal to clients partisan Cognitive biases toward optimism, confirmation of existing beliefs make it much more difficult for lawyers to neutrally assess the behaviour of their own clients The perjury trilemma: lawyers have duties to (1) be competent, (2) preserve client confidences, and (3) be honest in court. [read post]