Search for: "Hyatt v. United States Patent and Trademark Office" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2007, 4:29 am
Dudas, Director, Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
24 May 2021, 1:15 pm by Logan Murr
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, holding that requests for information by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to an individual are exempt from the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). [read post]
24 May 2021, 1:15 pm by Logan Murr
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, holding that requests for information by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to an individual are exempt from the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:16 pm by Kiera Flynn
Hyatt Docket: 10-1219 Issue(s):  Whether a plaintiff, who is appealing the denial of an application of a patent by commencing a civil action against the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) in a federal district court pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:40 am by kylew
Kappos, which held that district courts have broad power to consider new evidence in cases that contest United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) decisions. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 8:27 am by Dennis Crouch
United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 21-1526 Worlds Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 2:42 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 393 F.3d 1277, 1281 (Fed. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 2:41 pm by Dennis Crouch
United States Patent and Trademark Office et al, Docket No. 1:21-cv-00899 (E.D. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:22 am by Gene Quinn
This comes only days after the United States Patent and Trademark Office refused to grant reexamination of the patent in question. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
Patent and Trademark Office decisions in patent cases. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:45 am by Dennis Crouch
§ 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the United States Patent and Trademark Office incurs when its employees, including attorneys, defend the agency in Section 145 litigation. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:27 am by Sue D. Nym
Since 1993, the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) has pursued an “aggressive campaign” to free itself from oversight by and accountability to the courts. [1] At the same time, the USPTO has been just as aggressive in ignoring the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and related administrative laws that place responsibilities on the USPTO vis-à-vis the public. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 8:06 pm by Barry Barnett
One or more "examiners" in the United States Patent and Trademark Office look over your application and either accept or reject it, in whole or in part. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:51 am by Gene Quinn
KapposThis case intrigued me from the start because it seemed rather odd that there should be a nonprecedential opinion in an appeal to the Federal Circuit necessitated by a completely adjudicated inter partes reexamination at the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]