Search for: "IN RE: DRIVEN INNOVATIONS, INC. " Results 1 - 20 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2017, 3:19 am
In re Driven Innovations, Inc., Appeal No. 2016-1094 (January 4, 2017) [not precedential]. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 9:25 pm by Adriaan Louw
Each of the six finalists now completes a residency at the Legal Innovation Zone where they’re offered support and access to technology before pitching their final products to the panellists. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:10 am
In re Driven Innovations, Inc., Serial No. 77073701 (June 30, 2015) [precedential].Clear Error: Section109.08 of the TMEP provides that, in examining a Statement of Use, an Examining Attorney "should not make a requirement or refusal concerning matters that could or should have been raised during initial examination, unless the failure to do so in initial examination constitutes a clear error, i.e., would result in issuance of a registration in violation of… [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am by Merpel McKitten
”14SEP Holders’ Argument That Licensing at the End User Level is Necessary to Promote Innovation Does Not Withstand ExaminationContrary to SEP holders’ current arguments, component-based licensing will not destroy incentives to invest in standard setting. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 7:35 am
 “We're proud to have brought transparency to IP litigation with Legal Analytics. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Of those, eight were filed in response to patent applications submitted by Mind Medicine, Inc. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  This sort of liability cannot be anything but a profound disincentive to innovation and research. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
We read less of fresh ideas and innovation in relation to the provision of actual added-value legal content from law publishers. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 7:37 am by Eric Goldman
Viacom did market goods and services associated with the SpongeBob Squarepants marks, but this seems like an incorrect ruling if Krusty Krabb was never promoted separately. *  In re Driven Innovations, Inc. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 9:27 am by John
Biben and his contemporaries may state on the record, that’s what they’re buying. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  Another contingent fee-driven state AG action bites the dust, this one having yielded a $1.2 billion verdict. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:34 am by Rob Robinson
As we turn to 2024, we are focused on continuing to re-accelerate our revenue growth, investing to enhance our software offerings including advancing our innovative Cecilia capabilities, and strengthening our operating framework to improve our efficiency and profitability. [read post]