Search for: "IN RE: MARK W. ROGERS"
Results 1 - 20
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm
So we get the idea that we’re concerned w/TMs as they exist in the market, and we need to be skeptical about any rule that sees registration as a thing in itself. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 9:07 am
Aggarwal & Andrew W. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 11:15 am
ROGER SMITH and AON RE, INC., App. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:51 pm
Use of the whole mark doesn’t matter; strength of the mark favors defendant; etc. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
Sodium pentothol was the anesthetic of choice when the three drug regimen was invented back in the seventies, but it is no longer.1 The Commission urged that the regimen be re-examined, 1 Deborah W. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:28 am
Bill McGeveran: if you’re attracted to a European model would there be use as a mark as a requirement? [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm
Lots of marks held not famous are relatively not frequent: Buck Rogers, Blue Man Group, Field of Screams. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:45 am
W/Rogers, 85% of threat letters go nowhere, and the rest go away quickly. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:43 am
Ought to treat them differently from word mark and logos; we’ve lost something by refusing to consider ontology (at least claiming to).RT: Rogers as proof of concept. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
Already we’re starting to see the details wearing away. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:35 am
In re Bavaria St. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:50 pm
But if TM law is a law of competition, that matters; why be so comfortable w/allowing parties opportunistic definitions in litigation v. mark definition? [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am
” In practice, many of the gripe cases say they are following First Amendment precedents, only when they’re confronted by a subset of noncommercial speech—that which does not solicit the purchase of the speech itself. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am
Rolls Royce sued a rapper named Royce Rizzy, demanding he stop using the RR mark in connection w/stage shows, albums, and merchandise. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:31 am
Abandoned marks: using UC to deal w/remaining source ID meaning—we could do that, but instead we treat them like TMs and are willing to grant full relief. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Lemley: don’t assume we’re moving in the right direction. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Rogers v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:39 am
Most judges think they’re working w/in the law and want to do justice. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
” That is, Rogers is for uses that might confuse, but not about source. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am
Taking an all or nothing approach w/o considering consumers and competitors is bad. [read post]
