Search for: "IN RE: SUBPOENA MATTER"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,353
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2019, 12:50 pm
But sometimes we’re entitled to answers. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:36 pm
Now imagine you're the government, and you want to collect the suspect's evidence. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:26 am
Let me suggest that Khan should have given the matter more thought. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:31 pm
(Eugene Volokh) An interesting opinion in In re Request from the United Kingdom Pursuant to the Treaty Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Kingdom on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters in the Matter of Dolours Price (D. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
In the case of the day, In re Search of Premises Located at at 840 140th Ave. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 6:50 am
(Although I can claim zero credit for EFF's great work on this matter.) [read post]
19 May 2020, 8:28 am
The post COVID-19 Only Re-Enforces Wisdom of Collaborative Divorce – Part 2 appeared first on Collaborative Divorce Texas. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:48 am
If you're in the identity theft business it seems this would be a pot of gold. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:23 pm
As a first order of business, she wants to address a few preliminary issues to “make sure that we’re all on the same page. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:59 am
Two especially instructive decisions are the 1997 decision in In re Sealed Case (known to posterity as the Espy ruling); and the 2004 ruling in Judicial Watch v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
See, e.g., In re Grand Jury, John Doe No. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
We’re just not given much to go on as to why such a subpoena should be quashed. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 1:19 pm
Circuit held In re Sealed Case, 832 F.2d 1268 (D.C. cir. 1987), that due process/minimum contacts limitations apply in the context of criminal subpoenas, as Judge Williams reasons in the In re Grand Jury opinion. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 6:49 pm
The case of the day, In re Braga (S.D. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
” It’s not clear to what extent Trump’s opinion on this matters, but he can certainly hold things up in court. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 7:03 pm
” Although acknowledging that such a privilege does not yet exist, Levine argues that Judge David Tatel’s concurrence in In re Grand Jury Subpoena, Judith Miller, 438 F.3d 1141 (D.C. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 11:57 am
In In re: In the Matter of the Grand Jury Empaneled on May9, 2014, 2015 WL 2262650, No. 15-1264 (3d Cir., May 15, 2015), a clinical blood laboratory in New Jersey had been charged with bribing area doctors to refer their patients to the lab for blood testing. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:30 am
" * * * Chief Judge Sandra Lynch wrote the opinion in the case, captioned In Re… [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 1:42 pm
Prenda Law would need to re-issue the subpoena in the federal proceeding. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 2:10 pm
The spying matter is now playing on the big screen both in Congress and the courts. [read post]
