Search for: "IN RE: ZHANG "
Results 1 - 20
of 275
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2016, 2:50 pm
The CAFC made short work of "In re Zhang. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 7:12 am
This included reusing signature pages without express permission and changing the dates on the forms so as to appear that customers had re-executed. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 9:30 am
Who is Zhang Jun? [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 10:12 am
If you’re in that position now, here’s my best advice on how to navigate the complicated path to becoming a whistleblower,” Zhang wrote. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is In re China Education Alliance, Inc., Securities Litigation (C.D. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:29 pm
Against this thesis, Professor Zhang argues that a process of re-ideologization is under way. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:29 pm
Taisu Zhang, "China’s Coming Ideological Wars: In the reform era, economic growth reigned supreme. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
Zhang is SSN’s CEO. [read post]
7 Oct 2017, 4:37 am
Linda Zhang has published “Re-Building a Native Hawaiian Nation: Base Rolls, Membership, and Land in an Effective Self-Determination Movement” in the Asian Pacific American Law Journal. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 2:48 am
Xconomy discusses the brewing confrontation on CRISPR patents--http://www.xconomy.com/san-francisco/2015/04/15/doudna-berkeley-gain-experts-backing-in-crispr-patent-fight/--Text: The PTO has not said whether it would re-open the case—a procedure that’s called “interference,” in patent-speak—but the Doudna camp has submitted thousands of pages of documentation to press its case. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 7:00 am
As opposed to if you think Facebook is great, you’re more likely to work for Facebook. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 8:24 am
From your blogger (+ sidekick) for the week: we are Bruce Cain & Emily Zhang. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 3:09 pm
In this, there was an issue that the patent applicant had presented only arguments of counsel, with the examiner citing to In re Huang, 100 F.3d 136, 139 (CAFC 1996 ) and In re De Blauwe, 736 F.2d 699, 705 (CAFC 1984 ). [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 2:05 pm
But in terms of sheer interest -- for lawyers, at least -- it's all subsidiary to the "inside peek" one gets into some BigLaw partner-level machinations.According to the Court of Appeal, at least, here's what happens:"Petitioner Jinshu “John” Zhang was an equity partner in Dentons U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 10:38 am
Sadly, they're already starting to swoop. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:30 am
Zhang v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 9:30 am
In this, there was an issue that the patent applicant had presented only arguments of counsel, with the examiner citing to In re Huang, 100 F.3d 136, 139 (CAFC 1996 ) and In re De Blauwe, 736 F.2d 699, 705 (CAFC 1984 ). [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:29 pm
Her response:“If necessary, I might do some study in terms of this,” Zhang acknowledged. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 4:28 pm
My friend Brendan Carr over at Korea Law Blog just re-ran an excellent (and very blunt) post he wrote back in 2005 for The Marmot's Hole. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 1:45 pm
But I don't think they're entirely independent. [read post]
