Search for: "IN RE AMENDMENT OF RULE 2 OF RULES GOVERNING ADMISSION TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW" Results 201 - 220 of 280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by John Elwood
 As Confrontation Clause mavens already know, Beauchamp raises the question whether the Sixth Amendment prohibits the admission of unconfronted testimonial dying declarations. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Humphrey applies when federal habeas relief was unavailable as a practical matter to a Section 1983 plaintiff. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
This principle could easily apply to, for instance, speech about educational policies, proper rules governing sexual relationships, and “social justice. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm by Howard Knopf
But that is in turn only about 2% of the $24 per employee that Access Copyright asked for.This arguably much too high rate may be due at least in part to CMEC’s reliance on the same problematic “Volume Study” it used in the last 2005-2009 hearing that was already seriously flawed at the time by their own admission because, as I suggested in 2009. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 9:56 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Until recently, the IRS and Treasury Department were expected to complete for use in 2019 the major overhaul of the Form W-4 and related guidance in response to the Trump Tax amendments to Sections 3402, 3405 and other Code rules. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
Andreno, No. 06-3623"In case arising from illegal search of a restricted part of a home, related to sheriff's deputies responding to a domestic complaint made by plaintiff's ex-girlfriend, denial of summary judgment for defendant deputies is reversed where defendants are entitled to qualified immunity, as: 1) the law governing third-party consent searches is unsettled; and 2) defendants made a reasonable mistake in applying that law to the situation… [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences: (Managing… [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
They’re running a little behind this year, so it looks like the last opinions will come down Tuesday or possibly even Wednesday of this week. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am by Schachtman
  This requirement was aimed at chilling the efforts of itinerant, out-of-state screening physicians, whose conduct came under scrutiny in In re Silica.[11] Daubert, Its Progeny, and Amended Rule of Evidence 702 The Supreme Court’s opinion in Daubert was not only a watershed in the analysis of expert evidence generally but also reflected specific concerns about expert testimony in the area of product liability litigation. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 7:45 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
In keeping with the conference theme, this year the panelists will address the many intersections of law with bioethics, public health and society through a review of the major legal developments in areas with a range of bioethical concerns in a changing landscape of judicial, legislative and administrative decisions and actions in bioethics-related law. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am by Marie Louise
(Inovia) (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) (Patently-O) (Patent Law Practice Center) House debates patent reform – H. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
              Complaint Allegations and Trial Court Ruling Complaint The six causes of action in the complaint bundled together routine CEQA allegations with CESA and other resource law allegations. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 5:51 am by Todd Buchwald
” This was an unfortunate practical result, because the Executive branch interpretation is not persuasive. [read post]