Search for: "IN RE BROADCOM " Results 1 - 20 of 164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2007, 8:34 pm
Bloomberg did report:"The per-handset royalty we're asking for is less than the royalty Qualcomm demanded from Broadcom" during a lawsuit earlier this year over video-compression patents, he said. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 1:35 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The issue in In re Broadcom: Broadcom Corporation, Qualcomm Incorporated, andQualcomm Atheros, Inc. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm by Solomon Wisenberg
Therefore, the government cannot appeal, and Ruehle cannot be re-tried. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 6:42 am
We’re talking about the global settlement reached over the weekend by rival southern California-based chip makers, Broadcom and Qualcomm. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
  It stated that there had been no suggestion that the Magistrate Judge lacked authority to issue sanctions against Qualcomm, and now that Qualcomm had complied fully with the Sanctions Order, and had not objected to or appealed the sanctions, there is simply no need to re-open it. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 10:00 pm
However, Brigham Young has re-verified that he did not receive a degree.According to a Bloomberg News article by Ian King:Microsemi Corp. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 7:30 am by Florian Mueller
Germany's patent infringement judges unanimously oppose reform, but they're not going to be the ones to decide. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Doug Isenberg
Broadcom and Intel requested a re-examination of the patent after a Markman ruling last year in cases related to the patent was given in WiLAN’s favor. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 3:01 am
Indeed, in an August 31, 2009 American Lawyer article about the settlement (here), Susan Beck commented that "we’re still scratching our heads over this one. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 4:35 pm
Brewster’s March 5, 2008 “Order Remanding in Part Order of Magistrate Court re Motion for Sanctions Dated 1/07/08. [read post]
22 Apr 2017, 8:31 pm by Patent Docs
Broadcom and related cases; • Review “injury-in-fact” standing to challenge a final Board decision in view... [read post]