Search for: "IN RE ICON HEALTH AND FITNESS"
Results 1 - 20
of 97
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2019, 6:31 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 1:17-cv-00154 (D. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 10:15 pm
In re Icon Health and Fitness (Fed. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 4:11 am
In In Re Icon Health and Fitness, Inc. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 5:42 am
Cir. 2010) (quoting In re ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 496 F.3d 1374, 1379 (Fed. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 7:23 am
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., 2021 WL 2188219, No. 20-662-RGA (D. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 2:00 pm
Icon Health & Fitness (SCOTUS 2014); Highmark v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 5:46 am
” In re ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 496 F.3d 1374, 1379 (Fed. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 10:00 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, the Supreme Court overruled Federal Circuit jurisprudence and provided a flexible framework for district courts to grant attorney's fees in "exceptional cases"under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 1:02 pm
Public health advocates want people to monitor their health, and a lot of people think fitness trackers are cool ways to do it. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 12:06 pm
Icon Health & Fitness granted district court judges broad discretion to award attorneys’ fees as they see fit in patent litigation. [read post]
6 May 2024, 3:54 am
On motion of the USPTO Director as intervenor [pdf here], the CAFC remanded to the Board its decision in Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v ERB Industries, Inc., Opposition No. 91264855 (June 27, 2003) [pdf here], because the USPTO raised "legitimate concerns about the Board’s findings on the relatedness between ERB’s goods and iFIT’s services and also wishes to reconsider the decision in light of Naterra International, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 9:18 am
Icon Health and Fitness altered the fee analysis under the Lanham Act, vacating the panel decision. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 7:48 am
In re Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., 496 F.3d 1374, 1379 (Fed. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:32 am
” In re ICON Health and Fitness, Inc., 496 F.3d 1374, 1379 (Fed. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 8:02 am
” In re ICON Health and Fitness, Inc., 496 F.3d 1374, 1379-80 (Fed. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:01 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. attorney’s fees awards are becoming more common in patent cases. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:20 am
by Dennis Crouch Icon Health and Fitness v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:20 am
by Dennis Crouch Icon Health and Fitness v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 10:00 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, a 2009 case in which they determined that attorney's fees may be awarded in cases of bad faith. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 2:32 pm
So I would appreciate if you could shed some light on your experience in that arena and where you see that fitting in with other initiatives that employers maybe taking today. [read post]
