Search for: "IN RE MOTION FOR CONFLICT COUNSEL" Results 141 - 160 of 979
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2011, 2:00 pm by Jeffrey Krivis
Picture a Continuum of Conflict in which we start at one end with the filing of a litigated case. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:17 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Terry Bowen, No. 107,904 (Marion)Direct appeal; RapeJoanna LabastidaImproper admission of prior bad act evidenceInsufficient evidence of alternative means of rapeImproper response to jury question violating right to be present and public trialFailure to provide conflict-free counsel for preliminary hearingState v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:01 am by R.J. MacReady
A jury convicted Perez of aggravated robbery, and defense counsel withdrew on the date of the judgment.Perez filed a motion for new trial alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 6:44 am by brbadmin
” “‘It is now apparent that Kenner and his co-counsel appear to have had an undisclosed financial stake in the AI program, and they experimented with it during Michel’s trial so they could issue a press release afterward promoting the program — a clear conflict of interest.'” “Zeidenberg pointed to a press release a firm called Eyelevel appears to have issued in May, which included a photo of Michel and boasted that the company’s… [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:14 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
(“Recitals in a judgment or signed order of the court thus control over conflicting recitals in the record. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 1:19 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
HodgkinsonFailure to give lesser-included offenseFailure to appoint conflict-free counsel for IAC hearingState v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm by Rumpole
State, 17 So.3d 275 (Fla. 2009) the Supreme Court created a limited exception to striking pro se motions when the defendant has counsel. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 6:14 am by Craig S. Hilliard
L-7014-07MT (In re Aredia and Zometa, Case No. 278), holding that, while ex parte interviews are permitted under Stempler, the New Jersey Supreme Court clearly noted that ex parte contacts are not mandatory in all cases. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm by Jordan Brunner, Chris Mirasola
In summarizing what happened, we’re experimenting with a new format. [read post]
  Moreover, inclusion of indirect purchasers in the Rule 23(b)(2) injunctive class did not demonstrate that class counsel had prejudiced the state law claims of the indirect purchasers – making them inappropriate as counsel to the class – because inclusion of indirect purchasers in a Rule 23(b)(2) settlement should not extinguish their subsequent state-law claims, if any, on res judicata grounds. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 11:04 am by Emma Kohse
(Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri’s defense counsel argued a motion for discovery on this same issue at a military commission hearing earlier this month.) [read post]
  And the 23(a)(4) adequacy of the named plaintiffs could be satisfied with subclasses represented by separate counsel, which would overcome the potential conflicts. [read post]