Search for: "IN RE PFIZER"
Results 1 - 20
of 958
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2007, 2:05 am
Pfizer lost its initial bid on re-issue in one of the Lipitor patents.CNN reported:On Aug. 15, the U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 8:19 am
The rules should probably also be tougher overall, but that's distinct from the re-balancing point. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 9:46 pm
" Yes, the CAFC did cite In re O'Farrell, 853 F.2d 894. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 11:28 am
This goes to show, being brief is a virtue - even when you're dealing with a $10 billion patent. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 4:41 pm
Pfizer va payer la somme record de 2,3 milliards de dollars américains pour régler à l'amiable des poursuites judiciaires intentées pour publicité mensongère, selon le département de la Justice.La direction de Pfizer avait prévu le coup, puisqu’elle avait provisionné une charge exceptionnelle de 2,3 milliards à la fin de 2008 pour clore les contentieux concernant le Bextra et d'autres [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:53 am
Fierce Pharma Manufacturing reported on a lawsuit filed in New York Federal district court that accuses drugmaker Pfizer of “misleading consumers, and squeezing competitors, by using oversized bottles for Advil ibuprofen dry pills and Liqui-Gels” that misled customers into thinking they’re “buying more than what is actually being sold,” a practice called “nonfunctional slack-fill. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 9:57 pm
Accordingly, in the Caduet litigation, Pfizer moved to dismiss Ranbaxy's counterclaims of invalidity of the '893 patent on grounds of res judicata. [read post]
4 May 2012, 12:46 pm
The case is In re Quigley Co., 04-15739, U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 8:35 am
The blogosphere has raised an issue about the possible effect of Pfizer's acquisition of Wyeth on the pending Supreme Court case of Wyeth v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 6:26 pm
"100% increase in number of lawsuits against Pfizer in 2006 and then another 30% increase in 2007. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 12:36 pm
In re Gleave, 560 F.3d 1331, 1334 (Fed. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 3:51 pm
The "grant and hold" order in Pfizer reads: Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in In re Tobacco II cases, S147345 (see Cal. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 1:49 pm
WASHINGTON — U.S. officials say they’re actively negotiating for additional purchases of Pfizer’s coronavirus vaccine after passing up a chance to lock in a contract this summer since it was still unclear how well the shots would work. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 6:00 am
Rost from Pfizer. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 5:12 am
Making sure that I kept to very succinct yes/no answers and did not go into any more detail than I was asked to.Being naive, I agreed to let Pfizer provide me with my legal counsel (apparently, the Pfizer lawyers could not represent me, but they informed me that my lawer would be -----------and that he would contact me--highly discouraging me, once again, to get my own representation).At that time, Pfizer was going through another re-organization. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:01 am
"They're drivers that knowingly speed. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 3:26 pm
As first reported by fellow blogger, Kimberly Kralowec, on her webblog, The UCL Practitioner, the California Supreme Court has granted review of the Court of Appeal’s decision in In Re Tobacco II Cases and issued a grant and hold order for Pfizer. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 9:57 pm
In re Gabapentin Patent Litigation, No. 2006-1572 (Fed. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
In re Topps Co. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 2:57 pm
"There are two sides to the story, but I think we're kind of past that right now," the Pfizer lawyer said in court July 29. [read post]
