Search for: "IN RE RICHARDSON MINORS" Results 81 - 100 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
” [SPOILER: “They’re all tied for least likely to be successful. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am by Schachtman
  In the Bendectin litigation, the medication sponsor, Merrell-Richardson, was confronted with the testimony of an epidemiologist, Shanna Swan, who propounded her own, unpublished re-analysis of the published epidemiologic studies, which failed to find an association between Bendectin use and birth defects. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Ortiz-Graulau, No. 06-1768 In a criminal prosecution of adult defendant for taking sexually explicit photographs of a minor with whom he had a legal and consensual sexual relationship, conviction and sentence for possession of child pornography and exploiting a minor for the purpose of producing photographs is affirmed where: 1) despite defendant's claims that his purpose for taking those photographs was to memorialize his intimate relationship rather than to make pictures for… [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(Techdirt) Thomas Edison and National Inventors’ Day (Securing Innovation) (Patent Baristas)   US General – Decisions Los Angeles Superior Court jury finds founders of Blueprint Test Preparation breached non-compete contract with Robin Singh Educational Services (Law360)   US Patent Reform Patent reform 2009 (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Intellectual Property Watch) Manufacturing Alliance sends letter on patent reform to President… [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 7:14 am by Mandelman
Now, there does seem to be a couple of minor glitches in the whole principal reduction aspect of the program. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Shrake, No. 07-1790 "A conviction and sentence for possessing images of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct and transmitting them in interstate commerce are affirmed over constitutional challenges to the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act relating to limits on defendant's expert's pretrial access to data, and a challenge to the reasonableness of his 330 month sentence. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 1:09 pm by David Kopel
Hugh Richardson, High Peaks, Pure Earth: Collected Writings on Tibetan History and Culture 625-30 (Michael Aris ed. 1998). [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral rights famous… [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 8:18 pm
What they make clear is that although sex offenders on the whole are not at great risk of reoffending, there is a need to identify the minority who are. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Defendants accused (perhaps wrongly) of serious misconduct Many defendants could be ruined simply by being publicly accused of certain offenses (rape, sexual harassment, embezzlement, fraud, malpractice, and the like)—or can be materially harmed even by being sued for more minor matters, such as in landlords' unlawful detainer actions against tenants. [1] Even if they know they're innocent, they might agree to settle as a means of avoiding the lawsuit even being… [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:44 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
In fact, Republican Representative Tom Brady, the Ranking Minority Member of the Committee, stated in his opening statement at the start of the hearing, “Today the question isn’t whether to expand paid family leave, but how best to achieve it. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
S5 (1990); Straus S, Richardson W, Glasziou P, Haynes R., Evidence-Based Medicine. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm by familoo
In November a journalist I know and respect took to social media to air her concerns about the probity of family court process as regards transcripts of hearings. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
  One of our readers sent us that brief (a publicly filed document) and asked us to comment.So we will, but we’re not identifying either the case or the plaintiff’s lawyer – if you’re reading, you know who you are.To us, the plaintiff’s proposition is, in one word, absurd. [read post]