Search for: "IN RE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT FOR MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUC" Results 101 - 120 of 162
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Peter Jaszi: WIPO’s greatest failing may be in its educational activities, heavily weigh [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
The recent Supreme Court decision in Yukon Francophone School Board, Education Area #23 v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Purpose:This project will re-examine Article 213 of the Model Penal Code, which was ahead of its time when approved by the ALI in 1962, but is now outdated and no longer a reliable guide for legislatures and courts. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:40 am by Howard Knopf
In the last decade, users of copyrighted works in Canada have enjoyed major victories in the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
4 May 2014, 10:02 pm by Shelley Powers
” The authority for the Supreme Court decision rests squarely within the Supremacy Clause of the constitution that states that federal law shall be the “supreme law of the land. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 6:33 am
State (Cal. 1977), the California Supreme Court held that the state could validly reduce the mandatory retirement age from 70 to 67. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
With respect to legal custody, the court awarded the father decision-making authority, after consultation with the mother, over educational and medical issues. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 11:35 pm by Daniel Richardson
  Legally, they’re still prisoners.And that’s how SCOV decides today’s case.Just notice how far afield we’ve gotten from the text of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 1:13 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
However shameful the failure to update the waiting period for registry is, even worse is the 1996 law that created mandatory detention of immigrants without benefit of appointed counsel, as Prof. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:42 pm by Jeff Gamso
In particular, they dicked around with the state's mandatory continuing legal education requirements.Now, MCLE is inherently a bullshit scam.Ohio lawyers are required to obtain a minimum of 24 hours of approved continuing legal education every two years. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
(The precise rules about which laws have to be approved by the Bundesrat are quite obscure, and nobody seems to know them.) [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:43 am by Steve Hall
Alabama, we see both the clear continuation of a trend on the Court -- and the passing of a torch. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm by Schachtman
Mandatory Not Precatory The better reasoned cases decided under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, and state-court analogues, make clear that confounding factors must be carefully addressed. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:34 pm by Howard Knopf
A Despite the ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada in a recent defamation case, Crookes v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 9:11 am by Don Cruse
Sanchez noted that Palomo had briefly claimed an exemption from mandatory continuing legal education (MCLE) requirements. [read post]