Search for: "IN RE SMITH & NEPHEW" Results 1 - 20 of 151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2019, 1:30 pm by Cal Warriner
The headquarters for Smith & Nephew in the United States are located in Memphis, Tennessee. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 11:22 pm
The re-examination proceedings are still pending, and Smith &;amp; Nephew intends to pursue its appeal rights.These actions from the Patent Office do not affect Smith &;amp; Nephew's ability to defend the pending U.S. district court lawsuit, and do not affect Smith &;amp; Nephew's ability to continue to sell any of its NPWT products in the U.S., including foam… [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 1:50 pm by Clay Hodges
Let’s take a look at active litigation involving artificial hips: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip The Smith & Nephew “Birmingham” hip litigation is in full-swing. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm by Nietzer
The violations revolved around a Greek distributor of Smith & Nephew who paid bribes to Greek doctors so that they would purchase and use Smith & Nephew products. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 8:15 pm by Patent Docs
Smith & Nephew, Inc., that administrative patent judges ("APJs") were improperly appointed in violation of the Appointments Clause, to ex parte proceedings in In re Boloro Global Limited. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 6:04 am
The new warning letter says the FDA feels the steps Smith & Nephew has taken are inadequate. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
Convatec counterclaimed that Smith & Nephew’s Durafiber product would infringe the patent. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 3:05 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
DePuy ASR, DePuy Pinnacle, Biomet Magnum & M2a, Smith and Nephew, Wright Conserve, Zimmer Durom cup and Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II, are among hip replacements that continue to fail prematurely and require painful and risky revision surgery. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 1:15 pm by Rebecca Tapscott
Smith & Nephew, Inc., which was an appeal from an inter partes review, holding that administrative patent judges (APJs) were not constitutionally appointed. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 2:15 pm by Richard Torczon
Smith & Nephew, Inc., entered on Halloween 2019, a panel of the Federal Circuit held that the administrative patent judges (APJs) of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) were improperly appointed, and remanded the case for a new decision by a properly appointed panel. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 6:05 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
DePuy ASR, DePuy Pinnacle, Biomet M2A Magnum, Smith and Nephew Birmingham and R3, Wright Profemur and Conserve, Zimmer Durom cup and Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II and Encore, are among hip replacements that continue to fail prematurely and require painful and risky revision surgery. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:29 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
DePuy ASR, DePuy Pinnacle, Biomet Magnum, Smith and Nephew, Wright Conserve, Zimmer Durom cup and Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II, are among hip replacements that continue to fail prematurely and require painful and risky revision surgery. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:29 am
Defense attorneys for several of the defendants – specifically, Zimmer Holdings, Zimmer, Inc., Stryker Corp., Biomet, DePuy Orthopaedics and/or DePuy, Inc., Johnson &;amp; Johnson, and Smith &;amp; Nephew plc and Smith &;amp; Nephew, Inc., id., at *1 n.2 – filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the… [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 8:28 am by Dennis Crouch
Smith & Nephew Impact on Ex Parte Examination: In the pending case of In re: Boloro Global Limited, Appeal No. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:34 pm
Food & Drug Administration (FDA) is currently reviewing the safety of metal-on-metal hip implants like the DePuy ASR, DePuy Pinnacle, Smith and Nephew metal hips, Stryker Rejuvenate and Biomet m2a Magnum metal hips. [read post]