Search for: "IN RE STRICKLAND"
Results 121 - 140
of 481
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
Shaw, 13-897, a state-on-top habeas case that asked whether, in an ineffective assistance claim, “a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ultimately lacked merit precludes a federal habeas court from later finding either deficient performance or prejudice” under Strickland v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
That is, unless you’re American, in which case “soccer” is a game your nine-year-old daughter plays, and real football doesn’t begin for a few months. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
(At this point, the question may be what case in the pipeline is so plainly devoid of vehicle problems that the Court skips what we’re guessing is a relist to run a final quality check.) [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:36 pm
Under Strickland v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 2:01 pm
”) Strickland v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 6:40 am
See, e.g., In re Certified Question from United States Dist. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Hopkins, by Martha ChamallasSix Cases in Search of a Decision: The Story of In re Marriage Cases, by Patricia A. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:22 am
NHTSA Administrator David Strickland recently took the bold and, apparently, first-of-its-kind step of telling the U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 3:03 am
As we Baby Boomers age, we’re creating many problems for society. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 7:40 am
” Justice Sotomayor: “I – I don’t understand what you’re saying. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 7:12 am
” Such a universal rule seems directly contrary to Strickland. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 3:35 am
See In re Strategic Partners, Inc., 102 USPQ2d 1397 (TTAB 2012) [precedential]. [read post]
21 May 2013, 11:30 am
Wonder why they’re spending time and money on unlikely scenarios right out of Back to the Future and The Jetsons? [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:58 am
They’re also smarter, adjusting automatically to traffic, pedestrians, and road conditions. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
At its March 15, 2013 Conference, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the scope of qualified research expenses for tax credits, the constitutionality of an amendment to a state constitution prohibiting affirmative action, the effect when a parolee commits new offenses, and Hague Convention standards governing the return of abducted children. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
§ 2254(d), that a defendant retains a constitutional right to revoke his prior waiver of counsel at trial and require re-appointment of counsel to file a new-trial motion. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 4:10 am
If you’re wondering what the most-cited opinion in our system is, you may be bemused: With about 10,000 citations, it’s an opinion about ineffective assistance of legal counsel in death penalty cases, Strickland v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
§ 2254(d) and Strickland v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
TexasIssue: (1) Whether a state habeas petitioner who raises a freestanding actual-innocence claim under the Due Process Clause, and who demonstrates actual innocence by at least a preponderance of the evidence, must instead make that showing by clear and convincing evidence to warrant a new trial; and (2) whether, in light of trial counsel’s errors, petitioner received ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of Strickland v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 10:40 am
Toward that end, they're working with manufacturers working on such technology to determine how to make the cars safe, and what to do when crashes occur. [read post]
