Search for: "IN. SCH. DIST. NO. I-2 v. IN. SCH. DIST. NO. I-23"
Results 21 - 40
of 57
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2020, 10:57 am
—Houston [1st Dist.] [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
I. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:49 am
Dist. v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
Aaron Caplan, and I filed a brief—with the invaluable help of pro bono local counsel Karin L. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
LLC, 14-17-00503-CV (Tex.App. - Houston [14th Dist.] [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
Appraisal Dist. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
§ 157(b)(2)(I) in which final orders or judgment may be entered by this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
ANALYSIS I. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
The plaintiff now moves the Court to reconsider its Order and Reasons, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 59(e) and Rule 60(b).I. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
The plaintiff now moves the Court to reconsider its Order and Reasons, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 59(e) and Rule 60(b).I. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
P. 38.1(i); Lairsen v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 10:47 am
Pomona Unified Sch. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:36 pm
See Stepp ex rel MS v Midd West Sch Dist (JG) 65 IDELR 46 (MD Penna 2/23/15) {affirming HO decisions @112 LRP 45128 and 113 LRP 16891} Court agreed with HO that parent was not entitled to IEE at public expense because SD evaluation was appropriate.The U. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
Perma Research & Development v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
’s Office v. [read post]
