Search for: "INQUIRY OF B S" Results 1 - 20 of 6,621
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2021, 6:50 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) reads as follows: (b) During an Inquiry into the Validity of a Verdict or Indictment. (1) Prohibited Testimony or Other Evidence. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
  One NOI focuses on FERC’s approach to determining the Return on Equity (“ROE”) for FERC jurisdictional electric transmission and cost-based wholesale power rates (“ROE Inquiry”) [b],[1] and the second NOI focuses on the Commission’s transmission incentives policies (“Incentives Inquiry”) [ Energy Stephen Hug, Catherine McCarthy, Blake Urban view [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 2:01 am
iStock_000003589389Medium.jpg While noting general agreement that FRE 606(b) precludes inquiry into the validity of a verdict based on a juror’s testimony about racial or ethnic comments made “during the course of deliberations,” First Circuit finds the rule “cannot be applied so inflexibly as to bar juror testimony in those rare and grave cases where claims of racial or ethnic bias during jury… [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 3:37 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In effect, the deponent is speaking for the entity, presenting the entity's position on the listed topics, including for instance the entity's interpretation of events or documents. n98 Generally, inquiry into an entity's legal position is appropriate in a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition. n99 "The Rule aims to prevent a corporate defendant from thwarting inquiries during discovery, then staging an ambush during a later phase of the… [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 12:06 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to its federal counterpart, Texas Rule of Evidence 606(b)(1) provides that During an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify about any statement made or incident that occurred during the jury’s deliberations;... [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 4:31 am by Daniel B. Nora
However, the Court also held that the lender’s negligence here did not amount to “purposeful avoidance of the truth” sufficient […]Daniel B. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 1:50 pm by David Badertscher
The agency’s 6(b) inquiry will scrutinize corporate partnerships and investments with AI providers to build a better internal understanding of these relationships and their impact on the competitive landscape. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
  In addition, to the Independent Media Inquiry, there is the Convergence Review,  the National Classification Scheme Review, Commonwealth Government’s Privacy Issues Paper and The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) Review of privacy guidelines for broadcasters. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 11:44 am by Patricia W. Moore
U.S. of 606(b)'s general prohibition on juror testimony on an inquiry into... [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 2:14 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the jury’s deliberations or to the... [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 6:27 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Like its federal counterpart, Arkansas Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the jury's... [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:21 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to its federal counterpart, Section 24-6-606(b) of the Georgia Code provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror shall not testify by affidavit or otherwise nor shall a juror's statements be received... [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:21 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to its federal counterpart, Section 24-6-606(b) of the Georgia Code provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror shall not testify by affidavit or otherwise nor shall a juror's statements be received... [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 5:55 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the jury's deliberations or to the... [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:16 am by Karel Frielink
The post INQUIRY PROCEDURE INTRODUCED IN SINT MAARTEN appeared first on Karel's Legal Blog. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Throughout the four-year inquiry, the commission’s discoveries have revealed numerous failings in the province’s regulatory regime and deep-rooted corruption and infiltration of organized crime in the construction sector. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 12:48 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to its federal counterpart, Ohio Rule of Evidence 606(B) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the... [read post]