Search for: "IOWA SUPREME COURT v. Hoffman"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2019, 8:00 am
Henry County Health Center, 17-1971 (Iowa Supreme Court, Oct. 25, 2019). [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Janet Kowal v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 7:03 am
In 1946, the Supreme Court in Anderson v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
The Arizona Supreme Court has expressly declined to rule on this issue. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Back in January of 2013 we were shocked when the Alabama Supreme Court issued a long, and awful, opinion in Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
Supp. 2d 477, 496-97 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (citations and quotation marks omitted).The same result also occurred in an aspect of the Bartlett litigation that did not get appealed to the Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 12:38 pm
This was not correct, reports the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:37 pm
A new Rx for Arkansas: why the Arkansas Supreme Court should cure its interpretation of the learned intermediary doctrine. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
from Aporia to Analogy Michaela Frischherz, The University of Iowa: Not Gay Enough: Performing Identifications in U.S. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
from Aporia to Analogy Michaela Frischherz, The University of Iowa: Not Gay Enough: Performing Identifications in U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
At one time, the Arkansas Supreme Court applied the rule to a medical device in Despain v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
But when the California Supreme Court took a look at Kearl and the case-by-case approach to comment k, the court recoiled. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Superior Court, 79 P.3d 556, 563 (Cal. 2003).Lower California courts, but not the California Supreme Court, have cited Restatement Third §2 with approval. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:44 am
” Briefly: At ACSblog, Piper Hoffman argues that the Supreme Court should deny certiorari in Dukes v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Citing Hoffman v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 12:26 pm
This direct purchaser argument comes from an antitrust rule recognized by the Supreme Court in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Vanderloo, 386 N.W.2d 108, 116 (Iowa 1986); Brazzell v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
