Search for: "IPR Licensing Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2021, 10:40 am
Qualcomm Inc. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:44 am
Flex-Foot, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 6:36 am
MedImmune Licensee Standing Does not Apply to Portfolio License The Case: After some litigation, Apple eventually licensed 20,000+ Qualcomm patents in a six-year-deal.* Meanwhile, Apple also pursued inter partes review (IPR) of two of the licensed patents. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:20 am
Valencell, Inc. [read post]
In an IPR Proceeding With Several Listed Petitioners, The Petitioners Must Speak With A Single Voice
27 Aug 2014, 11:47 am
Thus, companies considering forming or joining a group to file an IPR should consider that one consequence of filing a petition as one of several real parties in interest is that they will not have the opportunity to be separately heard. 505 Games, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 9:29 am
On July 26, 2011, InterDigital Communications, LLC of King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, InterDigital Technology Corp. of Wilmington, Delaware, and IPR Licensing, Inc. of Wilmington, Delaware (collectively “InterDigital”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:40 am
Arthrex, Inc., 141 S. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:15 am
This week saw more Express Mobile, Inc. institutions at the Board, suggesting that, of the five rather widely asserted assets (hundreds of suits against hundreds of defendants), all five are likely invalid for various reasons. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:15 am
This week saw more Express Mobile, Inc. institutions at the Board, suggesting that, of the five rather widely asserted assets (hundreds of suits against hundreds of defendants), all five are likely invalid for various reasons. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 10:07 am
Hulu, LLC, Netflix, Inc., et al. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 5:00 pm
Electronics had 2 patents out of the 47, Thomas Licensing S.A. held 4, Bharat Heavy Electrical Held 2, Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc., held 3, Research in Motion Limited held 3 and the others, such as, Samsung, AIIMS, Saint-Gobain, Fujiflims, Honeywell, Bayer, BP Chemicals Limite A British Company, The Secretary, Ministry Of Information, Technology, The Trustees Of Princeton University, PPG Industries Ohio,Inc. and Honda Motors held one patent each. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 4:15 am
LG Electronics, Inc. was a watershed moment. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 6:36 pm
Appealing IPR Termination: BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:47 pm
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al., the U.S. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am
For example, Nokia has argued that “[r]equiring component-level licensing contravenes industry norms, leads to the ATIS and TIA IPR Policies being inconsistent with the ETSI IPR Policy, and could have unintended consequences for other SEP holders and the industry at large. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 12:06 pm
Perhaps parties are now too busy with IPR proceedings. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 11:59 am
Shaw issued the public version of Order No. 37 (dated July 17, 2012) denying Complainants InterDigital Communications, LLC, InterDigital Technology Corporation, and IPR Licensing’s (collectively, “InterDigital”) motion to compel in Certain Wireless Devices With 3G Capabilities and Components Thereof (Inv. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 11:15 pm
SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 5:30 pm
CardioKinetix, Inc.) [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 2:52 am
Intellectual Ventures and Xilinx Inc had been scheduled for trial this month. [read post]
