Search for: "IT&T Corp. v. Electrical Workers" Results 41 - 60 of 88
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2020, 11:06 am by Ronald Mann
As noted in my preview last week, GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v Outokumpu Stainless USA is the Supreme Court’s first arbitration case of the 2019 term. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm
.: Oral argument (Israel)___________Members of the diplomatic corps, the public and the media will find below practicalinformation regarding the organization of the hearings. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 7:09 am by Maxwell Kennerly
 General Electric Credit Corp., 585 So. 2d 274, 276 (Fla. 1991)(“employer is liable for the willful tort of his employee committed against a third person if he knew or should have known that the employee was a threat to others”); Henley v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
Asbestos Workers Local 84 (DST Insulation, Inc [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
The Home Depot, Inc: Employment law, like politics, "ain't beanbag. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
Charges filed by Electrical Workers IBEW Local 2; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1) and (3). [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 7:00 am by Guest Author
We find it hard to believe that anyone reading our treatment of, say, Hush-a-Phone Corp. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
This in turn requires that the subjective or discretionary element of claims interpretation (e.g., the elusive quest for “the spirit of the invention”) be kept to the minimum, consistent with giving “the inventor protection for that which he has actually in good faith invented” (Western Electric Co. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 12:03 pm
Perhaps the most similar case in Canada is Pacific Northwest Herb Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]