Search for: "Ice v. Com."
Results 41 - 60
of 97
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
Ice - In a decision that could have major implications for Ohio sentencing law, Court holds that Blakely does not prohibit judicial fact-finding for imposition of consecutive sentences. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:49 am
Take a look at State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:52 am
Closer to home, in Lima v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:45 am
Ice overrules State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 3:21 pm
That means investors will not be able to recover any money from the advisors to corporate frauds that melt their investments like ice cream in August on a Dallas sidewalk.The case, Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:06 am
Broadcom v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 3:51 am
(Which is what happened a few years back in State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 3:45 am
That he waited five years to file his motion to withdraw was simply icing on the cake. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 4:58 am
Ice implicitly overruled State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:41 am
Those findings, like ice cream, come in two forms: soft and hard. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 3:30 am
On the 11th, this past Friday, in State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 4:11 am
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:42 am
Ice, to the Ohio Supreme Court’s refusal in State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 12:08 am
The case, titled Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:40 am
But nine years later, in Collins v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:30 pm
(Note: The following post was originally published on Law360.com on January 15, 2013. [read post]
