Search for: "Import Wholesalers Corporation v. the United States" Results 41 - 60 of 166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2021, 11:30 am by Mark Graber
Hubley Ashton and Maxwell Evarts, who argued United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 8:00 pm by My name
 Pentalpha planned to sell the deep-fryer to its wholesale customers, including Montgomery Ward, for importation and resale into the United States. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:00 pm by My name
 Pentalpha planned to sell the deep-fryer to its wholesale customers, including Montgomery Ward, for importation and resale into the United States. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:21 pm by Cindy Cohn
This word game is important because Section 702 is set to expire in December 2017. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 4:00 am
A copy of the brief will be posted on the DU Corporate Governance web site later today. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:57 am by Jan Baran
More achievable could be a wholesale revisit of Buckley v. [read post]
” The ongoing uncertainty created by the Schrems II decision, coupled with growing calls from prominent EU officials for data localization and European “digital sovereignty,” risks a wholesale breakdown of data transfers between the EU and the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:06 am by Michael Dorf
 Absent the violation of some external norm, as in a case like United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 2:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court provided important guidance regarding price impact evidence at the class certification stage of securities class action litigation. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 3:48 pm
"On October 8, 2007, SLM Corporation, commonly know as Sallie Mae, the largest originator and holder of student loans in the United States, filed a complaint in Delaware's Court of Chancery against the buyout group led by J.C. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 12:03 pm by Gene Quinn
Yesterday the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Costco Wholesale Corporation v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am by INFORRM
Since Google LLC is domiciled in the United States, Mr Lloyd required permission to serve out under CPR 6.36, relying on the gateway contained in CPR PD6B – 3.1(9) i.e., claims in tort where damage was sustained, or will be sustained, within the jurisdiction. [read post]