Search for: "In Re General Development Corp. Bond Litigation"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2016, 8:26 am
And because the stadium bonds issued by the Ramapo Local Development Corp. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 5:10 am
Those bonds were backed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. at low interest rates. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 2:18 pm
Templo Fuente De Vida Corp. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
These adverse developments have generated a wave of private securities litigation, as well as regulatory inquiries by federal and state authorities. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 11:33 am
See In re Gold Bond Corp., 98 B.R. 128, 129 (Bankr. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 4:50 am
Securities Claims Exclusion In In re SRC Holding Corp.,[3] the Eighth Circuit applying Minnesota law, held that the plain language of a standard form securities exc [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:40 am
" In a related new development, the U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 6:26 pm
In an October 27, 2008 opinion (here), the Eighth Circuit, applying Minnesota law, held in the In re SRC Holding Corp. case that there is no coverage under a D&O liability insurance policy containing a securities claims exclusion for claims made against a financial services company and certain of its directors and officer for alleged wrongful acts in connection with the company’s underwriting and sale of certain municipal bonds. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(IP Think Tank) New force in Europe – EPLAW Patent Blog (IP Think Tank) IP references left out of last-minute, weak global climate deal in Copenhagen (IP Watch) UN Climate Change Conference, Copenhagen – IP discussion (IPKat) (Spicy IP) (IP Watch) (IP Watch) (WIPO) Implementing the Development Agenda nationally: WIPO seminar (Jeremy de Beer) WIPO traditional knowledge meeting stalls, but begins to breach trust gap (IP Watch) Poverty in the developing world: Should TRIPs… [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am
Global Global – General Compressed Executive IP Management & Strategy Course (IP Think Tank) Spend too much to protect too little (no. 14 in our list of IP mistakes) (IP Think Tank) (IPBiz) Fear of claim chowder… (IP Think Tank) IP and Business growth (IP finance) Management of IP in sustainable agri-development: essential or irrelevant? [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 7:58 am
.; and China State Construction Engineering Corp., the country's biggest home builder. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:54 pm
As detailed in previous blog posts, the development of meal and rest break provisions is otherwise in somewhat of a holding pattern due to the looming California Supreme Court decision, Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
At the same time, the SEC’s Inspector General has issued a number of reports critical of the agency, and Congress intensified pressure on the SEC and Department of Justice to bring cases in the wake of the financial crisis. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Resolving the partner-guardian tension: the key to general counsel independence. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
- Generic manufacturers aggressively promote expensive doxofylline over price controlled equivalent theophylline: (Spicy IP), Middle East – Ranbaxy strengthens presence in Middle East region: (GenericsWeb), Scotland: Future funding of stem cell companies in Scotland dependent on EPO Enlarged Board of Appeals’ decision on stem cell patentability: (IP finance), South Africa: More on AIDS/access debate - Patrick Bond article on Thabo Mbeki’s AIDS policy:… [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 12:42 pm
Cir. 2006); Sandt, 264 F.3d at1350–51; Finnigan Corp. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:38 pm
The employees’ paycheck withholdings were commingled with the company’s general assets and used for its general operating expenses. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:25 am
The bondholders turned down an offer for $120 million in new bonds. [read post]
5 May 2013, 9:01 pm
The seminal FTC MLM decisions are In re Koscot Interplanetary, Inc., 86 F.T.C. 1106 (1975), and In re Amway Corp., 93 F.T.C. 618 (1979). [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
The irony is that the new rigid rule, in the name of tightening, actually loosens the bonds obliging honesty. [read post]
